Why Isn't More Known? AASP
 

Home Page (18 week fetus, photo courtesy Westside Pregnancy Resource Center)
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Tel:
(509) 531-0309

General email

Webmaster email
 

 

 

Welcome
About
Support
News
Services
Case Studies
Share-a-Story
Prevention
Activism
Classroom
Statistics
Research
Crash Gallery
Sponsors
Press Room
Feedback
Contents
Links
Search

One important reason this issue has not received more attention is the lack of good data on the numbers and trends of pregnancy-associated crashes and related injuries to pregnant women and their babies. For the most part, such cases are greatly under-reported or unreported in crash and vital statistics data systems and remain off the radar screen of highway safety agencies.

The barriers to better data are many and deeply enmeshed in the nature of the problem and the design and limitations of current vital statistics death data and injury and crash injury reporting systems. Like SIDS, attributing a fetal death or a particular birth defect or fetal injury to a crash is often a diagnosis of exclusion. Further, such diagnoses are quite often hindered by the absence of in-depth investigation of potential clinical, crash and biodynamic factors.

In the sections below, the limitations of each potential source of reporting of both maternal and fetal outcomes is discussed in detail.

1. Mortality (deaths) in the Vital Statistics Systems

There are several situations that may arise when a pregnant woman is fatality injured in a car crash or other violent death.

  • Most often, if the woman dies shortly after the incident, the baby usually does not survive. There are heroic and emotional exceptions when the pregnancy is more developed and the fetus is viable outside the womb, but such cases make the news because they are so rare. In the most common scenario involving maternal death, the death of both the mother and baby, if there is no delivery then no birth certificate or fetal death certificate for the baby is ever filed and the fetal death goes uncounted.
  • Some states do have a place on the mother's death certificate to mark whether the woman was pregnant, but special studies have shown that this indicator box was not checked 65% of the time. Furthermore, persons killed in motor vehicle crashes are less likely to be autopsied to confirm early pregnancies than other types of violent deaths. The result is that crash deaths to pregnant women are poorly counted.
  • If the baby is less than 20 weeks gestation there is usually no requirement to file a fetal death certificate at all, whether delivered or not, and the fetal death goes uncounted.

If the woman does not die (or survives long enough to result in a delivery) there are again different situations to consider:

  • If the baby is stillborn less than 20 weeks gestation, usually no fetal death certificate is required and the fetal death goes uncounted. Even if such cases were reportable, it may be difficult with current diagnostic procedures and practices to assign with certainty whether the crash caused or played a role in the death. The fetus is quite small at this age and still-births for many other known and unknown causes are quite common until about the fourth month of pregnancy. Like SIDS, attributing a fetal death or birth defect to a crash is often a diagnosis of exclusion. This is an important area for more basic research.
  • If the baby is stillborn and older than or equal to 20 weeks gestation, a fetal death certificate is usually filed. However, if and when the crash is implicated, the cause of death on the fetal death certificate is categorized as "death to maternal injury," usually without any specific coding for what caused the maternal injury. Thus, state or federal fetal death report summaries never report the number of fetal deaths due to car crashes.
  • If the baby is born live and then dies from factors related to the crash or the mother's injuries, it is not legally a fetal death, but an infant death. However, the same problem remains with the cause of death on the infant death certificate. The death certificate is supposed to be categorized as "death to maternal injury," but again, usually without any coding for what caused the maternal injury. Thus, state or federal infant death report summaries never report neonatal deaths due to in utero car crashes.

2. Non-fatal Fetal Injury (morbidity) in Hospital Discharge Data Systems

  • For non-fatal events, government public health agencies that track injuries usually rely on data from hospitals. However, similar classification and coding problems exist that make it almost impossible to identify from hospital data alone which infants suffered either a birth complication or a direct injury because of a car crash. Thus, no state or federal hospitalized injury data system reports the number of neonatal injuries due to in utero car crashes.

3. Crash Data Systems

There are several levels and types of crash and motor-vehicle related injury data systems. All fail to include the fetus as an injured person and are not included as cases. Only one federal data system (and no state system) attempts to document if a female occupant in a crash was pregnant at the time of the crash and there is evidence that it undercounts such cases by a factor of 3 or more (see below).

  • Most states collect police reports of crashes and document who was injured. However, no state includes information about pregnancy status on any of their data collection forms or includes injured fetuses as cases in their data systems. Thus, state crash data systems, by themselves, do not report adverse fetal outcomes or the number of pregnant women injured in car crashes.
  • In the U.S., NHTSA investigates all fatal crashes in a system called the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). This system does not include a pregnancy variable for female occupants. Thus, NHTSA does not report the number of pregnant women killed in car crashes.
  • The Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) contains variables (since 1982) that identify the special instance of fetal death when the mother also dies. For 2002, this system reported 42 such incidents. To-date, no analysis or report of the cases defined by these variables (DR_CF1-4 and P_CF1-3) has been made (to our knowledge) and no further information about the fetus is recorded. Furthermore, its completeness has never been measured nor its methods documented. If the fetus dies but the mother survives (the more likely scenario) the fetal death is not usually recorded in this reporting system.
  • In the US, NHTSA investigates a sample of police reported crashes called the National Automotive Sampling System (NASS). Since 1995 this system has included a pregnancy variable. A paper was published using this data in 2002. Although the data system contains little fetal outcome data and evidence suggests it undercounts pregnancy associated cases by a factor of 3 or more, these data are useful for understanding patterns of age, restraint use, and driver status among the reported cases. Individual cases and vehicle crash pictures involving pregnant women (without identifiers) can be viewed online (use the 'sex' variable to choose pregnant cases, by trimester).

Insurers

 

Many of the barriers to tracking pregnancy related crashes and its immediate impact can be overcome by instituting affordable, efficient and ongoing linkages between crash reporting systems and birth and fetal death vital statistics data. A handful of research projects (Wolf, 1993, Schiff, 2002, & Hyde 2003) have demonstrated the use and begun to explore the advantages of this technique and AASP encourages this policy at the state level.


Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do - Goethe


Send mail to Webmaster email with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2004 Advocates for Auto Safety during Pregnancy (AASP)
Last modified: 07/26/04